Terminal Stupidity
If there's one government institution I love to bash, it would have to be the presidency. The genius who cheated her @$$ into office just never seems to get anything right.
Recently, she committed the worst act of slander and blasphemy anyone ever could commit: she said that the EDSA People Power II revolution was blessed by the late Pope. She is obviously trying to equate her rise to power with divine intervention. My problem with this is not so much that the insulted the memory of the late pope, but that she effectively blasphemed against God for getting the Divine Intervention angle mixed up into local politics, which is never divine. When one implies that one's rise to power was God-given, one uses God's name, not just the Pope's in vain. I know that I could not really expect anything intelligent to come from her lips, but this just crossed the line. She's not going to Heaven anyway, so what is she trying to do associating herself with the holy?
Tough Love
ProLife.Org.ph
The reason I'm bashing this is that the site featured a very poorly written article on Pro Life issues and the reproductive health bill. It hurts me to read this not because I'm pro-choice, but because I am Pro Life myself and seeing such a poorly written piece on my stand on reproductive health is insulting. Its author, someone calling himself Pusong Pinoy, is someone I would love to get his technique right, because I really believe in the Pro Life cause, yet the article he made was shaky. In his article entitled "HB 4016 - Divorce Bill filed by Feminist Liza Masa" the author effectively made a couple of critical errors in writing that would not survive scrutiny from the critical mind. I bash the article not because I hate the stand it took, but because the way it was written it does not help the cause. Think of this critique as tough love. I also hate not Pusong Pinoy, only his writing, and as a friendly piece of advice, I would like him to improve his writing because he seems to have potential.
Let me quote the Article, word for word, then "bash" it constructively. I am harsh, but believe me, it’s for the betterment of the cause:
Title: "HB 4016 - Divorce Bill filed by Feminist Liza Masa"
Comment: The title reeks of the fallacy of hasty generalization. It immediately equates feminism with the pro-choice cause, which is not true. Feminism aims to raise the status of women, not to control the population. Not all feminist are pro-contraception. If Pusong Pinoy knows his Pinoy literature, he may have come across Elynia Ruth Mabanglo's Regla sa Buwan ng Hunyo, a feminist poem with a pro-life agendum. Maybe Pusong Pinoy hasn't read this. If the Church and its people are to gain any credibility in this world, they better learn what actually happens in the world, and not make hasty generalizations like this.
Quotes:
" Will Divorce help in the success of FUTURE MARRIAGES? Big FAT NO.
Will Divorce encourage more FUTURE MARRIAGES? Big FAT NO.
Will Divorce benefit the lives of FUTURE CHILDREN in FUTURE MARRIAGES? Big FAT NO.
Will Divorce help in Family Formation and Family Stability? Big FAT NO. "
Comment: Again, hasty generalization. I'm not saying he is wrong, but statistical proof would have really helped his cause, and these stats are available.
" Then what is this Divorce bill for?
- This is to pander to the SELFISH wants of people who are into failed marriages.
- This is to give rise to a NEW INDUSTRY.. the DIVORCE INDUSTRY.
- This is to give rise to a NEW INDUSTRY... the Family Court Industry.
- This is to give even MORE POWER to the FEMINISTS... agents of family destruction."
Comment: Hasty Generalization. No statistical proof. Calling feminists agents of FAMILY DESTRUCTION really pissed me off though, because the kindest people I've ever met were all feminists. Religious zealots who speak like this turn people off from religion because of their inadequacy in stating their doctrine. I'm not saying that Pusong Pinoy is an idiot, but his writing is poor, and he is detracting from the Pro Life cause by producing statements like this. Fallacies won't attract people towards the cause. Sorry for the harsh words, but I am doing this out of love for the cause.
Anyway, the rest of the article is one long argumentative paper without real-life basis, hasty generalizations and nothing more. Read it yourself and cry like I did.
To his credit, Pusong Pinoy (or it seems like him at east) wrote another article where he finally provided statistics. But his writing is still very juvenile. I will "bash" that other article next.
Article:
"Debunking those Dogmatic Depopulation and Contraception Worshippers"
Quotes:
" As we have already proven in a previous feature: HB3773 is a TOTALITARIAN / DRACONIAN IMPOSITION of CONTRACEPTIVE IDEOLOGY on the Filipino People. "
Comment: The previous article proved nothing. It only showed what an awful piece of writing it was. Please improve on the style. I believe in the stand, but not in how it was put.
Quote:
"#1 It is FALSE for the DOH to claim that contraceptives IMPROVE THE HEALTH OF PEOPLE. The words "reproductive health" is FALSE PROPAGANDA. Pills, hormonal crap, injectables, abortion suction / menstrual regulation machines, IUDs, LIGATION, VASECTOMY, are RISKY. These CONTRACEPTIVES contribute to the DETRIMENT of people's HEALTH Many people get SICK, are INJURED, DIE, ENDURE life long side effects from these contraceptives. "
Comment: Reproductive health itself is not the problem, and not totaly false propaganda. Natural Family Planning actually falls under reproductive health, and Pro Lifers know that natural methods are ok. Pusong Pinoy judged the whole concept of reproductiver health by some of its parts alone, which is not good. The artificial means are troublesome, but not the natural means.
The Church itself is not anti-population control, as the local Pro Life website claims. I would suggest that Pusong Pinoy read up on Pope Paul VI’s encyclical Populorum Progressio. It allows population management, though not artificial means. Let me quote the article myself:
Taken from Pope Paul VI's "Populorum Progressio," March 26, 1967
Population Growth
37. There is no denying that the accelerated rate of population growth brings many added difficulties to the problems of development where the size of the population grows more rapidly than the quantity of available resources to such a degree that things seem to have reached an impasse. In such circumstances people are inclined to apply drastic remedies to reduce the birth rate.
There is no doubt that public authorities can intervene in this matter, within the bounds of their competence. They can instruct citizens on this subject and adopt appropriate measures, so long as these are in conformity with the dictates of the moral law and the rightful freedom of married couples is preserved completely intact. When the inalienable right of marriage and of procreation is taken away, so is human dignity.
Finally, it is for parents to take a thorough look at the matter and decide upon the number of their children. This is an obligation they take upon themselves, before their children already born, and before the community to which they belong—following the dictates of their own consciences informed by God's law authentically interpreted, and bolstered by their trust in Him. (39)
Quote:
"#2 The Philippines is NOT overpopulated at 84M. Japan reached 84M in 1951 and now has a whopping 127M people. Today in 2005, there are almost 43 million MORE JAPANESE than there are Filipinos! On the issue of density, Singapore is more densely populated than the Philippines, yet they PAY their women to make more babies."
Japan is an export economy, Singaporeans are unbelievably disciplined and hardworking. Japan and Singapore provide enough opportunities for their countrymen and women to progress, and thus could afford to have huge populations. That is not the case with us. We import everything we need, and we lose money each year instead of making it. False analogy. Again, the Church is not against population control, so don’t bash it. Bash artificial means instead.
Quote:
"#3 It is NOT TRUE that Filipinos breed uncontrollably. Filipina Total Fertility Rate in 2005 is ~3 children (~2 in Metro Manila ). This used to be 7 in 1960, 6 in 1970, 5.5 in 1980, 4.4 in 1990 and 3.1 in 2000. See the graph below. "
Comment: This is the only solid statement in the whole article. Why? Because it had proof to go with it, for a change.
Quote:
"#4 It is NOT TRUE that Filipinos are stupid and un-informed about contraception. Look at the Fertility trend from 1960 to 2005, that is not just contraceptive awareness, that is Contraceptive Mentality and Population control for 45 years being implemented on the Filipino People. 45 Years of Contraception Brainwashing has not brought happiness nor riches to the Filipinos. Implementing EVEN MORE contraception is FALSE IDEOLOGY; more CONTRACEPTION is INSANITY. "
Comment: The statement has potential, but with insufficient proof behind it in the way of solid facts and figures, I can't call the statement solid.
The articles had potential. Improvements are needed though, big ones.